Dynamics NAV Financials

account schedules, financial reporting, dimensions, budgets and all the rest of the fun, fun world of Microsoft Dynamics NAV from a (former) Controller who still uses the software every day

  • Account Schedule Examples
  • Account Schedule Formulas
  • Popular Series
  • Services
  • About

Complete row setup options for NAV account schedules

Posted: July 30, 2012 | Author: kpeters | Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: Account Schedules, balance at date, Classic Client, column layout, dimensions, Excel, export to excel, financial statement, general ledger, microsoft dynamics nav, NAV, net change, posting accounts, row setup, RTC, set base for percent, setup options, show opposite sign, totaling type, trial balance | 1 Comment

About a month ago, I published a post called Basic row setup options for NAV account schedules. This is a great place to look if you’re just getting started. However, if you’re looking for what else you can do with Microsoft Dynamics NAV account schedules, then this is where you want to be. This post will go through each and every field available on the account schedule row setup and talk about the available options. The functionality of these fields are exactly the same between the Classic and Role Tailored Clients. The only difference is in how they look on the screen and how you navigate between screens. Take a look at the pictures below to find the look you’re familiar with, but then keep reading for the explanations of what these fields will do in your financial reporting.

Role Tailored Client                                                              

This is a view of what I recommend you start with for basic row setup options.

This is a view of all available row setup options.

Classic Client                                                                          

This is a view of what I recommend you start with for basic row setup options.

This is a view of all available row setup options.

Row setup options – apply to both clients                     

Row No. is completely optional, but highly recommended. This simple element of the row setup will eventually be one of the key features of your account schedule, allowing you to calculate and organize with ease.

Description is the one place you have to communicate, in words, what you’re showing on each line of your report.

Totaling Type:  6 options to choose from

  • Posting Accounts pull data from your accounts designated as posting accounts on the G/L Account Card Account Type field.
  • Total Accounts pull data from your accounts designated as a total or as an end-total on the G/L Account Card Account Type field.
  • Formula allows you to calculate a basic formula on this row.
  • Underline places a single underline .
  • Double Underline places a double underline.
    •  NOTE:  This nifty addition showed up with NAV 2009 R2. If you are NAV 2009 SP1 or earlier, this won’t be available to you.
    • Both of the underline functions are there to give folks who print account schedules directly out of NAV some formatting options. If you’re exporting to Excel you’ve got some better format options to work with than these.
  • Set Base for Percent allows you to designate which row from your row setup will be used as the beginning point for a section to be included in a percent of total calculation. This feature showed up in version 5.0 and must be used together with a formula on another row to designate the end point of the section as well as some setup in the column layout. It’s a little fussy in the setup and inelegant in execution, but is still effective to get those vital comparative percentages onto your account schedules.

Totaling will be which general ledger accounts you want to pull or what formula you want to calculate, depending on what you selected in totaling type.

Row Type:  3 options to choose from

  • Net Change should be used, generally, if you’re reporting on income statement accounts (revenue/expense).
  • Balance at Date should be used, generally, if you’re reporting on balance sheet accounts (assets/liabilities).
  • Beginning Balance will be sparingly used, but you’ll want this for your statement of cash flows at some point.

Amount Type gives you three options:  Net Amount, Debit Amount and Credit Amount. You’re going to use Net Amount almost all the time, but I suppose if you were getting very granular in your account schedules and perhaps using them for detailed reconciling reports, this might be useful. If I’m getting down to this level of transactional detail, I’m usually going to the chart of accounts instead of account schedules.

Formatting Fields:  Bold, Italic, and Underline  These basic formatting fields are there to allow you to emphasize some of the rows of your account schedules. When you select these options on any row, the whole row is effected. You are not able to effect a single “cell” for formatting. What’s the difference between underline here and underline found in the Totaling Type options? You can get a more snug fit on your underline using this option since it appears in the same row of your data instead of in a row if its own.

New Page inserts a page break. This is commonly used when separating the pages of the balance sheet showing assets on the first page and liabilities and equity on the second page. I have also seen it used when folks build multi page account schedules.

Show Opposite Sign is the option you can select to change revenue credit balances or expense debit balances to the opposite sign for the purposes of presenting this data in a more non-finance friendly manner. No salesperson wants to see sales presented with a negative sign; use this to change that credit to a positive number on your reporting.

Show allows you to designate if a row will show (the default) or be hidden on the printed account schedule only. You can click this box as much as you want, but your rows will still show on-screen or when you export to Excel. If you print directly out of account schedules, this feature will work very well for you.

Dimension Totaling is the last option available and you might have noticed that I didn’t show them on pictures above. This is because they are unique for just about every user, and depending on your analysis view setup, may even be different from schedule to schedule. You can use just one, or you can use all four of the available dimension totaling fields, in whatever combination you like. These fields act very much like the Totaling field because this is where you will tell NAV what Dimensions you want shown and totaled from your general ledger accounts.

This posting is one of the Top 20 Most Viewed in the last year! Follow this link to see the entire list.


User Poll: Vote and leave your comments regarding what you use to produce NAV financial statements

Posted: July 11, 2012 | Author: kpeters | Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: Account Schedules, Excel, financial statement, FRx, JET, Management Reporter, SSRS, user poll | 6 Comments

Why I use NAV Account Schedules

Posted: April 25, 2012 | Author: kpeters | Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: Account Schedules, budgets, dimensions, Excel, financial statement, general ledger, NAV | Leave a comment

I use account schedules as the primary source of financial reporting at my company.  With all the available choices out there, why do I use account schedules?  I’ve got a whole list of reasons.

1)  I can custom build all of my financial statements, exactly how I want to see them.  

Especially when I talk with prospective NAV customers, I hear a lot of objections as to why NAV doesn’t come with “out of the box” financial statements.  If you think about this for a bit, what part of your company’s financials might fit the definition of “out of the box”?  Is your chart of accounts the same as someone else’s?  What about the name of your accounts?  Your numbering convention?  Is the way you present your financial statements just like anyone else’s?  If you built your financial statements using an out of the box solution, how long would it be before you began to customize them?

Why not build them the way you want them the first time and be able to customize them as your company changes?

2)  Account schedules tie directly to the general ledger.

Someone told me once that reporting from the general ledger was the best way to get to the truth.  Since my financial statements have got to be accurate and consistent above all else, I like this idea.  I know, that without a doubt, my account schedules tie back to my trial balance and my detailed transactional postings.  I can prove it out over and over.  I can use my account schedules to debunk some of the untruths that come out of some of our other reporting sources.  Knowing I can get to the truth makes me trust the results I get from account schedules and gives me confidence in deeming them as the place to get exactly the right answer.

3)  Budgets integrate really well with account schedules.

I use the budgets area of NAV extensively.  However, I only actually touch the budgets area once a year, when I populate them with our next years’ data.  Budgets integrate to account schedules so fluidly that I have no reason to go back and forth between the two during the year as I track how we’re doing in comparison to budget or even as I look ahead to remind myself of what the plan was.  I can get this information from account schedules and get all my financial information from one place.

4)  Dimensions along with account schedules are a powerful combination.

Account schedules without dimensions are like James Bond without Q.  James Bond can certainly hold his own without all the gadgets, but come on, the things that Q adds are really cool! Adding dimensions in almost as many combinations as you can think of gives you added power in your account schedules and lets you stretch beyond mere financial reporting and expand into operational reporting.

5)  They export easily to Excel.

My monthly financial statement package is 18 pages, all produced out of account schedules. Each month, I export directly to Excel and produce reports that are consistently formatted and look the same every month.  I’ve got good control over the process while still having the flexibility I need when we decide we want to make a change.  All of this gets loaded up to SharePoint for the end users who use them, and no tree products are harmed in the production of our financials.

6)  Account schedules can be built and maintained by finance folks without IT help.

This is, and always has been, the big seller for me.  I’m a DIY kind of person.  I do my own landscaping, I bake my own bread (not all the time), I can build a fire while camping, and I’m painting my own living room this spring.  These same principles flow through to my business.  I want to be able to do it myself.  I love my IT colleagues, but goodness knows they have enough to do without having to produce my financials.  Account schedules are easy enough to use that I don’t need to know a programming language, or how to accomplish a table join, in order to build them.   All I need is knowledge of my chart of accounts, what the structure of my dimensions and budgets are, what the differences are between balance sheet and income statement accounts, and some simple formulas.


What is there to talk about regarding NAV financial reporting?

Posted: April 21, 2012 | Author: kpeters | Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: Account Schedules, add-on, Analysis Reports, BREP, C/SIDE, Dynamics, ERP, Excel, general ledger, ISV, JET, Management Reporter, Microsoft, NAV, NAVUG, NAVUG Academy, Object Designer, PowerPivot, SQL, SSRS | Leave a comment

If you’re a Microsoft Dynamics NAV user, like I am, there are a whole ton of choices to make regarding financial reporting.

  • Account Schedules, the native financial reporting package that reports on general ledger transactions.
  • Analysis Reports, also a native NAV reporting option, that extends reporting to item ledger entries from the sales and purchasing tables.
  • Object Designer, the native C/SIDE development tool used for the NAV application, which includes a report writer.
  • SSRS (SQL Server Reporting Services), a Microsoft reporting tool package that uses the SQL programming language.
  • PowerPivot, the free Microsoft Excel add-on that became available with Microsoft Office 2010, allowing data to load from NAV (and other data sources) through a direct connection to Excel.
  • JET Express, a former ISV (Independent Software Vendor) reporting solution, released for NAV 2009 in September 2011 as available for NAV users, and included with the Microsoft BREP (Business Ready Enhancement Plan), instead of as a separately purchased add-on solution.
  • Management Reporter, recently released by Microsoft on March 31, 2012 as a free add-on for all Microsoft Dynamics ERPs with the caveat that, for NAV users, it is only available if you already had the licensing for FRx.
  • Any large number of additional ISV solutions, sold as separately purchased add-ons to NAV.

As the Controller for my company, it’s my job to stay informed on what’s available and determine which choices are the best possible given the available skills sets of the employees who use them and the overall cost.  It’s also my job to make sure I know what the future direction of the ERP software is, so I can advise on decisions we make as a company with that knowledge in hand.

Take note, that from the list above, two major options have been launched in the last seven months.  My feeling, as a NAV end-user, is that Microsoft has not delivered a clear direction for their financial reporting strategy for the NAV product, and has left the onus of choice on the user.

I have to admit, I’m the kind of person who likes choices, and I’ve sampled every single option on the list above in one way or another.  The reporting strategy for my company is based on three principles:  1) the report must balance to the general ledger, 2) it must be consistently replicated in future periods, 3) it must be able to be maintained by someone in the company with the right skill set.

So yeah, we’ve got a lot to talk about.

I’ve used account schedules as my primary financial reporting solution, at two different companies, since 2004.  I have the opportunity to teach about this reporting tool through NAVUG, doing webinars throughout the year, speaking at the annual conference, and even teaching classes for NAVUG Academy.  For a while, I’m going to talk about account schedules here, but you’ll occasionally come across other topics as we learn more about the NAV financial reporting landscape, and where it will take us next.


Newer Entries →
TwitterYouTubeFacebookGoogleLinkedInEmailRSS
MVP_Logo_Preferred_Cyan300_RGB_72ppi
All Stars_NAVUG(1)
400dpiLogo

Blog Stats

  • 658,420 visits

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts.

Join 474 other subscribers

Top Posts & Pages

  • Account Schedule Formulas
  • NAV AS 101 Lesson 4: Basic Elements of Account Schedules
  • NAV AS 101 Lesson 17: Budgets with Account Schedules

Account Schedules accounts payable accounts receivable aging analysis by dimensions Analysis Reports analysis views balance at date BREP budgets chart of accounts Classic Client code mandatory column layout community comparison date formula comparison period formula consolidation Convergence CustomerSource dimensions document date dual monitors due date Dynamics ERP Excel export to excel financial reporting financial statement fiscal year general ledger global glued column increase header item ledger entries JET journal entry keyboard shortcut learning Management Reporter manuals Microsoft NAV NAV 2013 NAVUG NAVUG Academy net change networking Office2013 paperless payment terms pivot table posting accounts PowerPivot productivity query tool reconciliation account reporting tool ROI row setup RTC set base for percent setup options shortcut show opposite sign SSRS tips and tricks totaling type training trial balance user group user level configuration user poll video

Blogroll

  • Microsoft Dynamics NAV Team Blog
  • Microsoft Connect
  • Microsoft Dynamics CustomerSource
  • I Love NAV
  • Microsoft Dynamics Community
  • NAVUG

Archives

  • December 2020
  • September 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • August 2019
  • May 2019
  • March 2019
  • April 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • September 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
Blog at WordPress.com. Mid Mo Design.
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Dynamics NAV Financials
    • Join 474 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Dynamics NAV Financials
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...